15
November 2005: The family of the murdered Belfast human rights solicitor Pat
Finucane met with Dermot Ahern TD for Louth, and Minister for Foreign
Affairs, in Dublin.
Daily
Ireland (16 November) reports:
Speaking
after yesterday’s meeting, Mr Finucane’s former business partner and
family solicitor Peter Madden told Daily Ireland that the Irish government
had been urged to consider taking legal action against the British
government.
Mr Madden said there appeared to be two options available to the British
government. The first was to establish an inquiry under the Inquiries Act.
The second was to announce that a proper inquiry could not now take place
without the involvement of the Finucane family.
“We made it very clear to the minister that the family are not going to
take part in any inquiry established under the new act,” said Mr Madden.
“The new act removes control away from a panel of judges and places it
into the hands of a minister in the government which stands accused in this
case.
“The family have asked the Irish government to continue supporting them in
whatever stand they take in the time ahead.
“The minister made it clear that the British had violated the Weston Park
agreement in relation to Pat’s case and in relation to not following Judge
Cory’s recommendations.
“He pledged the Irish government’s continued support for the family.”
Mr Madden said the Irish government had not ruled out mounting an
international legal challenge against its British counterpart . . .
Mr
Ahern has shown no such support for his constituents in the Ludlow family.
He and Taoiseach Bertie Ahern have never formally met with the Ludlow family
to discuss their concerns, and their government has yet to agree to demands
for public inquiries in Dublin on this and the other cases involving
collusion with loyalists in the murder of Irish citizens in the 26 Counties.
Given
this poor track record in their own jurisdiction, the British authorities
will not be unduly worried by criticisms from Mr Ahern and his government.
They
should lead by example and shame the British government into finally doing
right by the Finucane family and the other victims of collusion in the
North.
The
Ludlow family fully supports the demands of the Finucane family for truth
and justice for their murdered husband and father. Their case is a damning
indictment of British policy in Ireland.
See
also: Daily Ireland, 16 November 2005: Finucanes
call for lawsuit for the full text of the article quoted above.
I
Top I
13
November 2005, Read this short article from The Sunday World
(Northern edition), by Jim Campbell Truth
is out there
Mr
Campbell asks if loyalists got away with murder in the 26 Counties because
of garda incompetence or because of garda collusion with the RUC in the
protection of agents within the death squads. Though Seamus Ludlow is
mentioned, the main focus of the article is on the sectarian murder of
Christy Phelan, near Sallins, County Kildare, yet another forgotten loyalist
atrocity in the 26 Counties.
I
Top I
11
November 2005: Read four excellent articles about the publication of the
Barron Report on the murder of Seamus Ludlow from the local Argus newspaper,
Dundalk, published today:
Four
suspected of killing named
Family’s
call for a full public inquiry remains unchanged
“We’re
overjoyed all we wanted was truth of killing to emerge”
Gardai
were ordered to ‘abandon’ plans to interview four suspects
I
Top I
8
November 2005: In a disturbing development for the families of victims of
British state killings, and victims of collusion with loyalist death squads,
unionists have been assured that members of the British army and police
forces arrested for crimes before the Belfast Agreement will be treated the
same way as republican 'on-the-runs' who are allowed to return to the North
without prosecution.
As
the British government prepares to unveil its controversial proposals the
Northern Ireland Secretary insisted no one should be treated like a
second-class citizen under the judicial process.
He,
of course, ignored the fact that Britain's killers in Ireland - including
the suspected UDR killers of Seamus Ludlow - have always been protected
against the prospect of facing the judicial process. Time and time again
soldiers and police have avoided prosecution, and the murder of Irish
civilians has never been seen to ruin a soldier's career in the British
forces.
Disgracefully, Britain's Secretary of State, Mr Peter Hain today said:
"Any member of the security forces who might find themselves charged of
crimes pre-1998, should not suffer any discrimination compared with those
involved in paramilitary activity, loyalist or republican, who benefit from
the scheme and come through out on licence."
"This
is a proper judicial scheme and members of the security forces should at
least be treated equally."
The fact remains that British forces and their agents in Ireland have never
been "treated equally" with republican paramilitaries. There are
no British Army or RUC 'on-the-runs', so there can be no equivalence with
those who have always faced the possibility of arrest and prosecution.
Mr
Hain's raising of this issue will surely enrage the many relatives of the
victims of British state killing in Ireland, who will now see their
loved-ones murderers protected by law.
I
Top I
8
November 2005: See report from today's Irish Times newspsaper: Ludlow
family seeks sworn public inquiry where a Ludlow family statement is
explained.
See
also: The Dundalk Democrat, 9 November 2005: Full
public inquiry is Ludlow aim
I
Top I
8
November 2005: See The Belfast Telegraph report of a press release
from Margaret Urwin, Secretary of Justice for the Forgotten, press: Victims
group questions report into loyalist killing:
A
key finding of the Barron Report into the murder of Seamus Ludlow by
loyalists does not "hold water", a victims' group spokeswoman said
today.
Margaret
Urwin from the Justice For The Forgotten organisation, which represents
people in the Republic who have suffered from bombings and shootings,
queried Irish judge Henry Barron's findings on the failure of gardai to
interview four suspects in the Ludlow murder.
The
RUC disclosed the suspects' identities to the southern authorities in 1979
and Mr Justice Barron found that the "only credible explanation"
was because they did not want to set a precedent of closer co-operation with
the RUC during interviews.
Ms
Urwin said she did not accept the reasons given in the Barron Report for the
quashing of Garda Detective Superintendent Dan Murphy's request for
permission to speak to the suspects by his superiors in Garda headquarters.
. .
To
read the whole Belfast Telegraph report go here.>>>
To
read the press release from Justice for the Forgotten go here.>>>
I
Top I
5
November 2005: In a Belfast
Telegraph exclusive report, Michael McHugh, spoke to Paul Hosking,
one of the four loyalist suspects named by Mr Justice Henry Barron in his
private inquiry report that was published under parliamentary privilege by
an oireachtas committee on Thursday.
Mr
Hosking admits to have been present when Seamus Ludlow was murdered, but he
maintains his innocence of the crime.
In
an extraordinary statement Mr Hosking:
said
he was tired of having the finger pointed at him and added that he may make
a submission to the Irish Justice Committee, which will consider the report
in January.
"This
has been going on for years and I am fed up with it," he said. "I
feel like I am the victim, it is awful for my family and they have gone
through hell."
While
the Ludlow family is sorry to hear that Mr Hosking's family has suffered, he
should be reminded that the victims here are the murdered Seamus Ludlow and
his family who have lived through almost thirty years of loss and pain,
aggravated by lies and smears which helped keep him and his companions free
from justice.
To
read the article go here
>>>
See
also: The News of the World, 6 November 2005: I'm
no killer, says 'branded' UDA man Loyalist hits at Report; and The
Sunday Life, 6 November 2005: 'Murder
car' man feels like a victim
Daily
Ireland, 5 November 2005: Ludlow
suspect in swap deal
I
Top I
5
November 2005: Writing in today's Irish Independent, Maurice Hayes,
commenting on the publication of the Barron Report on Thursday, concludes
with the suggestion:
Maybe
the time has come to draw a line under the past to agree to a closure of the
books and to move on from there.
While
kind advice is always welcome, Mr Hayes should know that the Ludlow family
takes advice from their legal representative and their friends, and not from
columnists in the Irish Independent who know nothing of the loss this
family has suffered.
I
Top I
5
November 2005: Read this important Editorial from The Irish News: Ludlow
family deserve justice
See
also: The Irish Independent -
Editorial, 5 November 2005: A
different country; and The Irish Independent,
5 November 20095: Garda
chief vows to clear his name in Ludlow probe inquiry
The
Irish Examiner, 5 November 2005: Wren
rejects claims of links to Ludlow case
The
Irish Times, 5 November 2005: Wren
rejects claim on role in Ludlow inquiry
I
Top I
4
November 2005: See this report from LMFM Radio:
Ludlow family not ruling out legal action against
Gardai
The family
of loyalist murder victim Seamus Ludlow say they haven’t ruled out taking
legal action against the Gardai. The 47 year old forestry worker was shot
dead by members of the Ulster Defence Regiment in May 1976, close to his
home at Thistle Cross, outside Dundalk. A report published yesterday
evening, revealed that even though the killers’ identies were known this
side of the border 18 months later, no action was taken, for fear that the
IRA would attack the Gardai for co-operating with the RUC. Seamus Ludlow’s
brother, Kevin, says they could still take legal action.
See
also, the following press coverage of yesterday's publication of the private
Barron Report:
The
Irish Times, 4 November 2005: Ludlow
report criticises Garda investigation
The
Irish Times, 5 November 2005: A
quiet man known for his charity
The
Irish Times, 4 November 2005: 'If
the IRA had killed him we would have been treated better
The
Irish Times, 4 November 2005: Former
senior Garda officers may be called to Oireachtas committee
The
Irish Times, 4 November 2005: Former
Garda chief threatens action
The
Irish Times, 4 November 2005: Former
Garda chief criticised murder investigation
The
Irish Times, 4 November 2005: Garda
stopped from quizzing suspects
The
Irish Independent, 4 November 2005: Ludlow
family insists public inquiry is crucial for justice
The
Irish Independent, 4
November 2005: Security
concerns 'halted murder pursuit'
BBC
News online: 4 November 2005: Call
for public inquiry into 1976 murder
RTE
News online, 4 November 2005: Wren
rejects Barron report finding
The
Irish Sun, 4 November 2005: Storm
as Ludlow report is revealed
Daily
Ireland, 4 November 2005: Ludlow
relatives accuse authorities of not pursuing killers because of fear of
upsetting British Family lashes government
The
Irish News, 4 November 2005: Ludlow
murder 'a random sectarian killing
Irish
Daily Star, 4 November 2005: No
result in death probe Gardai ignored RUC tip on loyalist killers of Louth
man
The
Belfast Telegraph, 4 November 2005 Relatives
of man killed by loyalists urge police action probe
The
Irish Examiner - Editorial, 4 November 2005: Family
needs a full-scale inquiry
The
Irish Examiner, 4 November 2005: Report
critical of handling of Ludlow case
The
Irish Examiner, 4 November 2005: 'We
think this goes right to Cabinet level'
The
Irish News, 5 November 2005: Ludlow
family call for public inquiry into death
I Top
I
3
November 2005: It has been a long and hectic day for the Ludlow family,
and a day filled with drama, disappointment, shambolic confusion, and
finally relief that another phase of the Ludlow family's campaign for
justice has been completed.
At
last the private Barron Inquiry Report has been puiblished, more than
twelve months after it was received by the Dublin government.
By
all accounts the 100-page Report is complete, there being no deletions or
redactions.
Earlier
in the day, the Ludlow family were not at all happy with the way they were
being treated by the government and the oireachtas committee regarding the
timing and the important detail of invitation or non-invitation to
the event.
As
of yesterday (Wednesday) evening the family were being led to believe that
the Barron Report would not after all be published until Friday morning.
Then, late Wednesday Jimmy Sharkey was informed by a journalist the the
Report would indeed be published on Thursday. No formal notification was
forthcoming from the government or from the oireachtas committee.
This
apparent snub angered the Ludlow family! In the absence of such an
official invitation it was decided that the Ludlow family would not be
going to Dublin. The Ludlow family would not allow themselves to face
press queries about a Report they had not seen!
Jimmy
Sharkey and his uncle Kevin Ludlow spoke out against this governmental failure
on local LMFM Radio, and his anger got through to the authorities in
Dublin - they must have been asked to comment on their failure.
Was
it a breakdown of communications or was there something more sinister
involved? These were the questions that came to mind.
It
was seen as yet further proof of the state's contempt for the Ludlow
family and consistent with the contempt the Ludlow family have been facing
for almost thirty years now.
The
government was clearly shaken by the press and family reaction to their
mishandling of the Ludlow family's interests. Michael McDowell,
Minister for Justice, addressed the issue with an announcement in
Leinster House. He said that copies of the Report would be rushed up to
Dundalk for the family before 3.00pm. He regretted that the family had not
been kept informed.
It
was then decided that Ludlow family members would go to Dublin.
Relatives
of Seamus Ludlow were really looking forward to getting the Barron Report.
Imagine their dismay when, while still in travelling to Dublin, they
received a phone-call from solicitor James MacGuill, informing them that
there may be no publication of the Report that day after all, it could be
postponed until Friday.
This
made the relatives of Seamus Ludlow really angry, not knowing what games
were being played in Dublin. They were determined to go on to Dublin and
raise pure hell until they got the Barron Report, or at least a
satisfactory explanation for the latest setback. On arriving in Dublin
they found that the media people waiting at the hotel, were just as
puzzled and angry as they were.
It
was nearly two hours later before confirmation came through that the
oireachtas committee would be publishing the Barron Report at 5.00pm. The
Ludlow family and their solicitor would receive copies of the Report at
4.00pm so that they could read through it before it was published.
The
published 100-page Barron Report names all of the loyalist suspects and
Judge Barron is highly critical of the Gardai for their failure to go
after the suspects after 1979. He points out that files are missing from
Gardai Headquarters and the Department of Justice. He points the finger of
blame for the failure to prosecute at Laurence Wren, a former Assistant
Garda Commissioner.
In
a letter sent to three weeks ago Mr Wren warned Mr Justice Barron that he
had no intention of accepting the conclusions about his role that appear
in the published Report. He wrote: "If the report is eventually
published as it now stands, I will be compelled to take corrective action
to clear my name."
Mr
Justice Barron did not find evidence of collusion, but that is hardly
surprising since the British authorities in the North gave him practically
no cooperation, and many files in Dublin are missing, incomplete or
were never mmaintained. He was not allowed to find the evidence of
collusion. All the more reason in the Ludlow family's view, for a public
inquiry.
Sometime
after the Barron Report's publication, and many press, TV and Radio
interviews the Ludlow family group went to the RTE studios where Jimmy
Sharkey and James MacGuill, (Ludlow family solicitor) and Paul O'Connor
(of the Pat Finucane Centre, Derry) were interviewed on air on the Prime
Time programme.
In
all of these interviews - outside Leinster House, at Buswell's Hotel, or
at RTE - the Ludlow family maintained that the Barron Report cries out for
a fully independent public inquiry as the only way to get to all the facts
of the case and to finally secure justice for the late Seamus Ludlow
Download
the Barron Report from the Oireachtas website (pdf file)
I
Top I
3
November 2005: Statement issued by Mr Michael McDowell, Minister for
Justice:
Mr
Michael McDowell T.D., Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform,
today welcomed the decision of the Oireachtas to refer to the Joint
Oireachtas Committee on Justice, Equality, Defence and Women's Rights the
Report of the Independent Commission of Inquiry into the tragic death of
Seamus Ludlow some 30 years ago.
The
Minister also noted that the Joint Committee will consider, as well as the
Report itself, observations made by former Commissioner Wren and Mr.
Justice Barron. The Minister said he looks forward to examining any
recommendations the Committee may consider making and added that he does
not consider it appropriate to make any further comment at this stage
pending the Joint Committe's full consideration of the matter.
The
Minister said he wished to offer his sincere condolences to the family of
the late Seamus Ludlow and he expressed the hope that the work of the
Commission of Inquiry and its referral to the Oireachtas Committee would
go some way towards alleviating their continuing distress.
See
also:
ireland.com, 3
November 2005: Ludlow
murder was 'random sectarian killing' - Barron
UTV news online,
3 November 2005: 'Barron
report to be published'
I
Top I
2
November 2005: The following appeared on the Dundalk El Paso Times
website. The report confirmed intense speculation that the Barron Report was
about to be published. The Ludlow family was hearing reports from
journalistic sources that the Barron Report would be published either
Thursday or Friday.
The
El Paso Times site reports:
LUDLOW
REPORT TOMORROW ?
Speculation
is mounting that the Barron report on the murder of North Louth man
Seamus Ludlow, will be published tomorrow. The killing of the 47 year
old forestry worker by a gang of loyalists in 1976, has been
investigated by former Justice Henry Barron. According to sources, his
findings are being presented to the government today.
I
Top I
29 October
2005: From the Dundalk-based Elpaso
Times website:
LUDLOW
REPORT EXPECTED
The
Taoiseach has told the Dáil that the Barron Report into the murder of
Co Louth man, Seamus Ludlow is likely to be published in the next few
weeks. Mr Ludlow’s body was found dumped near Ballymascanlon, close
to the border with Co Armagh, after he was picked up by a UVF gang in
Dundalk in the summer of 1976. Members of the Gardaí are expected to
come in for criticism in the report for the manner in which the
investigation was handled. It is understood that the delay in
publishing the report arose from difficulties in identifying then
members of the gardai who were implicated in the case, and are still
living.
I
Top I
26
October 2005: The following welcome news was reported on the website of the
local LMFM Radio station:
Taoiseach
says report into Ludlow killing to be published soon
The
Taoiseach has told the Dail that the Barron Report into the murder of County
Louth man Seamus Ludlow is likely to be published in the next few weeks. Mr
Ludlow was found dead at Ballymascanlon, close to the border with County
Armagh, after he was picked up by a U-V-F gang in Dundalk in the summer of
1976. Members of the Gardai are expected to come in for critcism in the
report.
I
Top I
25
October 2005: Supporters of justice can now
make a donation to our Seamus Ludlow Appeal Fund in return for a copy of a
special music CD produced by kind supporters of the Ludlow family campaign.
The
CD features as its leading track An Ode To Seamus Ludlow written
exclusively for the CD by Phil McCabe and brought to you by the voice
talents of Tom Moore. To Phil and Tom and to all who helped produce this
excellent CD, a sincere vote of thanks.
If
you are a lover of good Irish music and you would like to contribute to our
Seamus Ludlow Appeal Fund just send an e-mail to tam@thebhoys01.freeserve.co.uk
for details about how to get a copy of the CD.
Find
out more.>>>
I
Top I
16
October 2005: See today's Sunday World (Northern edition only) for
journalist John Keane's detailed report on thre murder of Seamus Ludlow: 30
years on - secrets behind an evil killing Gardai blamed IRA gang.
John
Keane had written about the murder of Seamus Ludlow for the Sunday World back
in May 1976, when he was one of the few journalists to speculate that this
was a loyalist sectarian killing in County Louth. (John Keane's original
1976 Sunday World report can be accessed from this site's Press
Coverage page.)
The
latest two-page article reports that the four-man loyalist killer gang
(with their identities revealed for the first time in a national Sunday
newspaper) visited several pubs in Dundalk known to be frequented by their
intended target, now deceased (who is also named for the first time).
The
circumstances of the murder of Seamus Ludlow on May 2 1976 are described
in some detail.
The
Sunday World report continues:
Unable
to find their man the gang was heading home when it encountered the
unfortunate Seamus Ludlow hitching a lift.
Mr
Ludlow was put into the back seat of the car and he directed them to his
home at a crossroads on the main Newry road.
The
car turned right at his home but carried on down the side road for a
further 500 yards.
After
stopping the killers ried to pull their victim from the car but succeeded
only in pulling off his jacket.
One
of them then fired three bullets into him in the back of the car and they
dumped his body on top of a ditch. . .
To
read John Keane's full report for the Sunday
World use this link.>>>
I
Top I
30
September 2005: See today's Dundalk Argus report Minister
raised Ludlow murder with NI Secretary, where it is confirmed that
Foreign Affairs minister Dermot Ahern has raised the Seamus Ludlow murder
with the British Secretary of State in Belfast.
I
Top I
28
September 2005: RTE
News reports that Foreign Affairs Minister Dermot Ahern, who is also TD
for County Louth, says the still unpublished Barron report into the May
1976 murder of Seamus Ludlow raises serious questions
There
are still no indications as to when the Barron Report, received by the
Dublin government in October 2004, is to be published.
I
Top I
23
September 2005: See important article on the Ludlow
Murder Cover-up, from The Phoenix, a Dublin news magazine:
Ludlow
had been shot by a British counter-insurgency loyalist proxy gang based in
Newtownards and controlled by the MRF (Military Reaction Force) -
forerunners of the notorious FRU (Force Research Unit). They had been tasked
with killing a Catholic (since deceased) who had ostensibly gone on the run
after weapons were discovered near his Co. Down home. This individual was in
fact an MRF agent sent south to infiltrate the IRA. Given a choice he
couldn't refuse, he became an IRA double agent. The loyalist proxy gang (led
by a UDR officer) failed to locate him in Dundalk and murdered the innocent
Ludlow on the way back to base.
The
above confirms much of what the Ludlow family has been saying about this
foul murder for years. Use this link to read the complete article.>>>>
I
Top I
21
September 2005, See The Dundalk Democrat: Jury
was on the verge of a walkout and The Dundalk
Democrat: We
were afraid to talk back Sisters break their
silence
I
Top I
20
September 2005: Another important development, reported by local LMFM Radio
News:
Council
seek public inquiry into Ludlow killing
Louth
County Council is to write to the Taoiseach and Minister for Justice seeking
a full, public and independent inquiry into the murder of Seamus Ludlow. It
follows the adoption of a motion tabled by councillor Tomas Sharkey. The saw
mill worker was shot dead by loyalists in May 1976 and an inquest earlier
this month heard that gardai knew the identities of his killers within 18
months of the murder, but failed to take any action.
I
Top I
11
September 2005: See today's statement
from Mr Bernard Moffatt, Secretary General of the Celtic League, an
organisation that has given the Ludlow family valuable support for a long
time now:
LUDLOW
MURDER - PRESSURE FOR BRITISH TO REOPEN THE CASE
Ireland's
Foreign Minister should have no difficulty in his avowed
intent to persuade the British government that they should act over
the murder of Co. Louth forestry worker, Seamus Ludlow, almost thirty
years ago.
In November 2000 the Northern Ireland Office, Security Policy and
Operations Division, assured the Celtic League that it would be keen
to pursue any information pertaining to the killing. . .
To
view the full statement from the Celtic League use this link.>>>>
I
Top I
9
September 2005: See The Argus, a local Dundalk newspaper, for these
two reports of this week's fresh inquest for Seamus Ludlow:
Identity
of Ludlow's killer known to Gardai
Unlawful
Killing
See
also: The Dundalk Democrat, 21 September 2005, Jury
was on the verge of walkout
I
Top I
9
September 2005, See RTE News online: Ahern
to raise Ludlow murder with Hain.
The
Minister for Foreign Affairs, and TD for Louth, Dermot Ahern, has said he
will raise the sectarian murder of Seamus Ludlow by loyalists with the
British Northern Ireland Secretary, Peter Hain.
The
Ludlow family had asked the minister to raise the issue to find out why no
one was ever prosecuted for the murder, despite the fact that two men made
statements in 1998, admitting their role in this foul murder.
However,
the Director of Public Prosecutions in Belfast decided not to press charges.
This extraordinary failure to prosecute Seamus Ludlow's alleged killers has
never been explained.
No
doubt the Ludlow family have many questions for the British authorities
regarding their role in protecting the UDR/Red Hand Commando killers of
Seamus Ludlow.

See
also: 9 September 2005, www.online.ie
News: Ahern
To Raise
Ludlow
Murder With Hain
10
September 2005, The Irish News: Minister
to raise 1976 murder with secretary
10
September 2005, The Irish Examiner: Ahern
to raise issue of Ludlow murder
10
September 2005, Daily Ireland: Minister
to raise murder
10
September 2005, Daily Ireland: Letters
to the Editor - Garda deficiencies run very deep

I
Top I
8
September 2005: See this report from today's edition of The
Irish News, It has certainly been a busy and eventful week
for the Ludlow family: O'Loan
had concerns over Ludlow probe
Police
Ombudsman Nuala O'Loan had concerns over the investigation into the loyalist
murder of Co Louth man Seamus Ludlow, it has emerged. Although Mrs O'Loan
could not mount a probe as it was outside her jurisdiction, she examined
both RUC files and Garda material relating to the killing of the forestry
worker almost 30 years ago. . .
For
the full report use this link.>>>>
See
also: The Irish Sun: Tell
us what you know about Seamus's murder for a report of Joe Costello TD's
(Irish Labour Party) welcome call on Taoiseach Brertie Ahern to
publish the Barron Report on the murder of Seamus Ludlow as soon as possible
because of the disturbing disclosures that came from this week's second
inquest at Dundalk courthouse.
The
private Barron Report has been with the Irish government since October 2004,
and still there is no known date for its publication.

See
also:
The
Irish Sunday Mirror, 11 September 2005: Publish
or be damned
The
Irish Examiner, 8 September 2005: A
file will always remain open, say gardaí - this report names the four
loyalist suspects who were arrested by the RUC in 1998.

I
Top I
7
September 2005: See the weekly Dundalk
Democrat newspaper's detailed report of the two-day fresh inquest
into the death of Seamus Ludlow.
This
report features detailed accounts of evidence given by former state
pathologist Professor John
Harbison, who carried out the post mortem examination in 1976. Also
featured are reports of evidence given by former detectives John
Courtney, who collected a file from the RUC in February 1979 which named
the four loyalist suspects in Seamus Ludlow's murder, and Ted
Murphy, the man who conducted the most recent investigation in 1998.

See
also: The Irish News, 7 September 2005: 'Gardai
evidence strengthens case for public inquiry'
The
Irish Independent, 7 September 2005: Ludlow
family renew plea for murder inquiry
The
Irish Times, 7 September 2005: Inquest
told of statements admitting part in killing
Daily
Ireland, 7 September 2005: Call
for public inquiry
The
Belfast Telegraph, 7 September 2005: Probe
call into 1976 murder

I
Top I
7
September 2005: The following report appeared today on the UTV News online:
WEDNESDAY
07/09/2005 12:49:19
|
| |
Taoiseach
urged to publish Ludlow murder report
The Taoiseach Bertie Ahern is being called on to publish the report
on the investigation into the 1976 murder of Seamus Ludlow. . .
Labour spokesperson for Justice Joe Costello says the investigations at the
time raise serious questions about the administration of justice on both
sides of the border.
I
Top I
6
September 2005: A
jury at Dundalk courthouse today returned a verdict of unlawful killing, in
accordance with the wishes of the Ludlow family, at the end of the second
inquest into the murder of Seamus Ludlow. The inquest lasted two days.
Speaking
afterwards to the press and on national RTE television News bulletins, the
Ludlow family reiterated their demand for a public inquiry into the murder,
saying the inquest had raised many unanswered questions.
There
was nothing at all revealed from the private Murphy report on the original
murder investigation, much to the dismay of the Ludlow family. The inquest
had been delayed for more than three years because of the refusal of the
gardai to hand this and other documentation over to the coroner Ronan
Maguire.
When
the Murphy report was eventually handed over to the coroner it was on the
basis that it remained confidential. The coroner would be entitled to submit
sections of the report in the form of submissions to the inquest at his
discretion, though this did not happen. Thus, many of the answers the Ludlow
family hoped this report would provide remain hidden away.
It
was also confirmed that two of the fatal bullets used in the killing of
Seamus Ludlow are indeed missing. No trace of them has been found and no
explanation for their disappearance has been offered. In a revelation
further disquieting for the Ludlow family it was also revealed that Seamus
Ludlow's clothing, which might still be useful for forensic and evidential
purposes, have also disappeared. Again, no explanation was given!
These
men had been identified to gardaí 19 years earlier as the killers of Seamus
Ludlow, but when the information was passed on to Garda Headquarters,
nothing happened.
In
1996, then Chief Superintendent Ted Murphy was asked by the Garda
Commissioner to re-examine the case surrounding the murder of Seamus Ludlow.
Seamus
Ludlow was murdered by a gang of four loyalists, now known to be members of
the British Army UDR and the Red Hand Commando murder gang, just outside
Dundalk on 2 May 1976. An inquest was held shortly afterwards, without the
Ludlow family being informed or present, but the Attorney General in 2002
directed a new inquest be held as a result of new information.
Yesterday
former Chief Superintendent John Courtney told the inquest that he was given
the names and address of four men by the RUC in 1979 whom he believed had
carried out the murder.
He
passed that on to Garda Headquarters but despite his request for authority
to proceed, it was not forthcoming.
Former
Chief Supt Murphy today said that in 1996 he contacted the RUC and the
informant who had given information about the four killers.
The
four loyalists were arrested and taken here to Castlereagh RUC Station for
questioning. Two of them, he said, provided independent and accurate details
about the murder of Seamus Ludlow.
They
described how the shooting took place in their car and how they left the
body. However, no charges were ever brought against the men.
The
conclusion of the fresh inquest was widely reported on RTE Television and
Radio News bulletins, as well as the local LMFM Radio. It was also given
good coverage on the national press.

See
the following press and TV reports of the second and last day of the Seamus
Ludlow inquest and the Ludlow family's reaction to the jury's verdict of
'Unlawful Killing':
RTE
News online, 6
September 2005 22:08
,
Unlawful
killing verdict at Ludlow inquest
The
Irish News, 7 September 2005: 'Gardai
evidence strengthens case for public inquiry'
The
Irish Daily Star, 7 September 2005: 'UDA'
Murder Probe Call
The
Dundalk Democrat, 7 September 2005: Seamus
Ludlow murder is now officially an unlawful killing
Daily
Ireland, 7 September 2005: Call
for public inquiry
The
Belfast Telegraph, 7 September 2005: Probe
call into 1976 murder
The
Irish Independent, 7 September 2005: Ludlow
family renew plea for murder inquiry
The
Irish Times, 7 September 2005: Inquest
told of statements admitting part in killing
The
Irish Sun, 7 September 2005: 'Loyalist
kill was random'
See
also: This exclusive report from The Dundalk Democrat, 21 September
2005, Jury
was on the verge of walkout