The Murder of Seamus Ludlow in County Louth, May 1976. Towards a public inquiry?
Introduction to the murder of Seamus Ludlow and the official cover-up.
The recent Campaign for Truth and Justice.
Other Ludlow Family Sites.
The Irish Examiner, 6 August 1999:
Perceptions of cover up from a closed inquiry
In normal circumstances one would expect an inquiry into events which took place a quarter of a century ago to be conducted in public. That would at least go some way towards assuaging long held suspicions of a cover up over alleged involvement of elements of the Northern security forces in the bombings. Similarly, questions have been raised about the possible role of security personnel in the killing of 47 year old Seamus Ludlow whose unsolved murder is also to be the subject of an inquiry, also to be held in private.
The air of secrecy surrounding the two inquiries, announced yesterday, will only serve to fuel suspicions of a continuing cover up. In the Ludlow case, three former members of the UDR were arrested in connection with his death and a report sent to the North’s Director of Public Prosecutions. A bachelor with no paramilitary connections, he was murdered as he thumbed a lift home from Dundalk and was later found shot in the head.
If problems are posed by the security aspects of the case, surely they could be heard in camera.
In view of the fact that the Commission report published yesterday flows directly from the terms of the Good Friday peace agreement, the establishment of an a truly open forum would presumably be a pre requisite to addressing the suffering of the victims of violence as a necessary element of reconciliation. If a culture of tolerance is to be promoted, the work of the Victims Commission must be seen to be transparent.
It is entirely appropriate that the probe should be conducted by an independent figure of recognised status and authority such as a retired judge of the Supreme Court. And it is also fitting that the findings be published. But the cloak of secrecy surrounding the tragic events which happened so long ago is perplexing, unsatisfactory and unacceptable.
Undoubtedly the former Tánaiste John Wilson has gone to pains to address the suffering of the victims of violence. But the element of privacy will prove highly controversial given that relatives want a public hearing. It will endorse perceptions of a cover up. As far as they are concerned nothing short of an open inquiry will suffice.
perpetrators may never be brought to book, the re examination of these forgotten
massacres of recent Irish history is a vital part of the healing process.
The Irish Examiner, 6 August 1999: Perceptions of cover up from a closed inquiry
The Irish News, 7 August 1999: Ludlows call for public inquiry
The Dundalk Democrat, 7 August 1999: Ludlow murder inquiry report "A place and a name"
The Sunday Tribune, 8 August 1999: The case that is not going to go away
The Examiner, 10 August 1999: Report recommends inquiries into Ludlow murder, Dundalk bombing
An Phoblacht / Republican News, 12 August 1999: Dublin/Monaghan and Ludlow inquiries must be public Report of the Victims Commission
The Dundalk Democrat, 14 August 1999: "Ludlow inquiry must be public" - says Arthur Morgan
The Dundalk Democrat, 14 August 1999: "Dublin/Monaghan bombings inquiry should be public" says O Caolain
The Dundalk Democrat, 21 August 1999: "A deafening silence"
I Homepage I I Top I I Press Coverage I I Victims Commissioner's Report I I Barron Inquiry I I Terms of reference for Barron Inquiry I I Fresh Inquest I I Celtic League Support I I New GuestMap Guest Book. I